Queer Coded Language in The Link

A Monthly Social Medium for Lonely People

Before the days of Tinder and Grindr, there was The Link. A lonely hearts publication which allowed members of the public to reach out for friends or pen pals by placing a classified advert of twenty-five words or less. Published monthly in London between 1915 and 1921 (known as Cupid’s Messenger during its first year), it also acted as a means for homosexual men to discover each other and make contact. At a time when homosexuality was illegal, this was of course risky business. Classified ads in these instances were written in a covert manner, with a coded language we could say, to avoid raising suspicion.

Where the majority of ads took the format of ‘young male seeks girl of similar age’, ‘gentlelady seeks gentleman’, or where males were seeking genuine friends of either sex, numerous adverts also appeared for same-sex connections only. Two examples of genuine same-sex requests from November 1919 and August 1920 respectively, include ‘Gentleman (London, S.E.), seeks correspondence same sex with view to friendship. Special interest in music and literature’, and ‘Young Fellow (London, N.), 21, wishes to meet another about same age, view friendship’. Here, the direct nature of both adverts, clearly indicate platonic interest. In contrast, in terms of male requests for possible same-sex romantic associations, one such advert from the January 1920 issue reads:

Young Gentleman London (N.W.1), 24, musician, cultured, artistic, intellectual, lonely, and unhappy, seeks unconventional, broadminded male chum, same age and tastes. Warm, sympathetic friend.

Whilst one could say this advert is completely innocent and purely refers to a normal friendship, the use of the words unconventional and broadminded suggest a connection beyond the heteronormative, and warm and sympathetic allude to the caring and romantic. Together, they carry a secondary and covert meaning for homosexual interest, without actually referring to a same-sex romantic attachment. Another example from September 1920 is:

Young Man (London, S.W.), 22, artistic, musical, desires companion, own sex, same age and temperament.

The choice of the word companion is interesting here, as opposed to chum or pal which are both in frequent use throughout The Link. Companion suggests a more solid and permanent form of relationship, and certainly hints at something more than friendship. Also on the same page:

Bachelor (London, N.W.), 44, educated, good appearance and position, very lonely, lived abroad years, wishes meet other gentlemen 44-70. Real friendship given.

Here, although friendship is clearly offered, using the term bachelor in the context of a lonely hearts publication with a request to meet other gentlemen, again alludes to something more than platonic friendship. Several words start to become repetitive in adverts of this type throughout The Link, which include unconventional, artistic, musical, affectionate, and sympathetic. These words, when in combination with each other or with terms such as companion, form the coded language.

In The Link therefore, we have clear indications of classified adverts being placed by homosexual men, albeit in a covert manner. The result of such ads did not go unnoticed. A court trial which took place against the publication in 1921 accused its proprietor Alfred Walter Barrett of corrupting public morals; along with William Smyth of Belfast, Geoffrey Smith of Enfield, and Walter Birks of Carlisle. On the arrest of a separate crime, Birks was found in possession of love letters from Smyth, and Smyth subsequently found in possession of correspondence of an explicit nature with Birks and other individuals, including Smith. The Birks and Smyth relationship was discovered to have started through an introduction via The Link. Fifteen separate charges were made of conspiring to corrupt public morals ‘by introducing men to women for fornication and by introducing men to men for unnatural and grossly indecent practices’, along with the men being ‘charged with aiding and abetting the commission of gross indecency and conspiring to enable the commission of such acts with others unknown’. The eventual outcome was two years hard labour for all four men with the judge passing the most severe sentence possible. 

In essence, this case demonstrates the absolute severity of the law where homosexuality was concerned before its partial decriminalisation in the United Kingdom in 1967. Hence we see why there was a necessity for covert methods such as a coded language, for homosexual men to recognise and meet each other before this time.

Sources

The Link – November 1919, January 1920, August 1920, and September 1920. Available to view from the British Newspaper Archive.

Cocks, H.G. (2002). ‘Sporty’ Girls and ‘Artistic’ Boys: Friendship, Illicit Sex, and the British ‘Companionship’ Advertisement, 1913-1928. Journal of the History of Sexuality.

Daily Mail (1921). ‘Link’ Sentences. Daily Mail, 11 June 1921.

The Baron Adolph de Meyer

Of the poor, pathetic phantoms of the past, a faint memory of the day before yesterday, the Baron de Meyer is forgotten today by all but a few who still appreciate the contributions he made to this time in Vogue’s pages, where his best work appeared.

Cecil Beaton

As a pictorialist photographer, the Baron Adolph de Meyer (1868-1946) focused on creating images that could rival the artistic qualities of painting, and also raise the reputation of photography to more than a mere mechanical representation of a scene. The sophisticated and gifted amateur who turned professional and worked for the likes of Vogue and Harper’s Bazaar, completely changed the course of history for portrait photography and fashion magazines alike. Despite his achievements however, as Cecil Beaton points out, he remains a largely forgotten and uncelebrated figure within the history of photography. 

Born in Paris but growing up mostly in Germany, de Meyer was of a German-Jewish and Scottish aristocratic background. In 1899 in London, he married the beautiful socialite and artist’s model, Olga Caracciolo. Although a loving relationship, it was also one of convenience. He was homosexual, and Olga either bisexual or lesbian, as well as being the goddaughter and possibly even illegitimate daughter of Edward VII. They lived surrounded by London’s high society. Amidst the grand parties and artistic circles they enjoyed a certain amount of freedom, until the aftermath of the Oscar Wilde scandal and the onset of World War I prompted them, and many others, to escape Europe. As a result, the de Meyers moved to New York in around 1913 where Adolph became the first staff photographer for Vogue, and also appeared in the sister publication Vanity Fair.

Up until the early twentieth century, images in fashion magazines were either produced from drawings or rather formulaic and uninspiring studio photographs. These shots normally comprised of painted backdrops, generic poses, and natural daylight or studio lighting which provided an evenly lit space throughout the scene. With treating photography as a form of art, de Meyer’s expert darkroom printing techniques and understanding of light, texture and tone, allowed him to move away from this previous format. Through this shift, it was he who invented the genre of fashion photography which paved the way forward for the more eye-catching imagery that we know today. He regularly experimented with creative, artificial backlighting, and he often used diffused lighting by stretching gauze over the camera lens. Differential focusing was also a regular tool, where the centre of an image could be sharp and in focus but leading to a graduated softening around the edges. 

One image which clearly demonstrates some of these techniques is that of Josephine Baker, taken c1925 (below). Baker was an entertainer, civil rights activist, and a French Resistance operative during World War II. In this photograph, she is framed within a highly reflective backdrop which complements the sparkling dress and pearls. The dreamy and atmospheric effect is also accentuated by much of the bottom half of the image being in soft focus. From her facial expression, the image seems to capture a slightly unusual moment in her comedic stage personality, indicating with little certainty of what may have happened just before the shot was taken.

Josephine Baker, c1925
Direct carbon print, 45.2cm x 29.5cm, The Met Museum, New York

In an essay on de Meyer, Anne Ehrenkranz suggests that Baker was one of the numerous women photographed by the artist who were starting to experience the freedom and sexuality of a new and uneasy age; and in portraying them he adopted a similar approach to the artist Gustav Klimt of emphasizing the psychological condition, and often with a distinctive linear style. There is a definite similarity between this image and the many full-length paintings executed by Klimt during the early twentieth century. Portraits such as those of Gertrud Loew (below) and Emilie Flöge, both from 1902, are prime examples of this. Female sitters, often with signs of inner turmoil or struggle apparent in their faces, are framed within elegant settings or reflective backdrops. With a familiarity of Klimt’s work, it’s very likely de Meyer would have been thinking of elements from these paintings when capturing the long, slimline dress of Josephine Baker. 

Gustav Klimt, Portrait of Gertrud Loew, 1902
Oil on canvas, private collection

Some of de Meyer’s best work featured a distinctive luminous effect, which was something very new to fashion and portrait photography at the time. A master of his trade, he would fix silk over his filters, drape his female sitters in satin or transparent materials, spill buckets of water on marble flooring, or even spray flowers with artificial dew. In the 1921 image of Jeanne Eagels used in Vogue magazine (image at top), the French actress is seen leaning across a table staring intently towards a vase. Backlighting provides highlights to the hair and the outline of her face, whilst additional lighting creates a strong reflection on the vase and transforms the plant into a beacon of luminosity. From a contemporary viewpoint, we could say there is a gay sensitivity at work here. Perhaps aided by his sexuality, de Meyer understood the delicacy and femininity required to produce a photograph such as this. The image is converted into a fairy tale scene with both Eagels and the viewer transfixed on the plant. An article in The Craftsman magazine from 1914 explains that ‘he deliberately focuses his camera not upon the sparkle of an eye but upon the light that illuminates the eye’. Although not referring specifically to this image, it does give a clear idea of the thinking behind de Meyer’s creativity, by observing and reacting to the effect of light on different surfaces.

Having returned to Paris in the 1920s to work for Harper’s Bazaar where he enjoyed greater control over the images he produced, by the 1930s a harder edged style of fashion imagery had emerged. De Meyer was eventually replaced at the magazine as his photography was considered outdated. He later questioned whether his commitment to commercial photography was a failure to his art. Olga passed away in 1931 and Adolph went back to the United States before the outbreak of World War II. Usually reported as being either his partner or his adopted son, de Meyer then lived with the much younger German, Ernest Frohlich, until his death in 1946. Always tinged with a little sadness, considerable flair, and a lot of mystery, de Meyer’s life and work continues to fascinate me. Both Adolph and Olga de Meyer are certainly figures I expect to return to regularly in the future, for further research and writing.

Sources

Beaton, C. (2014). The Glass of Fashion: A Personal History of Fifty Years of Changing Tastes and the People Who Have Inspired Them. New edn. New York: Rizzoli Ex Libris.

Ehrenkranz, A. (1994). Essay. In: Ehrenkranz, A. Hartshorn, W. and Szarkowski, J. A Singular Elegance: The Photographs of Baron Adolph de Meyer. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, pp. 13-49.

The Craftsman (1914). The Artist’s Wonder-Stone: How Baron de Meyer Sees Modern Spain. The Craftsman, October 1914, pp. 46-52.

Search used Adolph de Meyer books on Amazon

Gustave Caillebotte’s Boating Party and the ‘Gay Gaze’

In an article published last year, Jim van Buskirk commented on the apparent avoidance of discussion around themes of homosexuality and homoeroticism in the work of the French Impressionist painter Gustave Caillebotte (1848-1894), by authors of books and exhibition catalogues on the artist. Mostly active in the 1870s and 1880s, Caillebotte stands apart from the other Impressionists for being the one artist to frequently depict men, and often in ambiguous scenes where one is never entirely sure of the artist’s intention or the viewpoint of the male figures within. One only has to search on social media sites such as Twitter or Tumblr to find a plethora of homosexual references to the painter, and blog posts such as recent ones by Zimra Chickering and Bryn Donovan which question the sexuality and intentions of the artist. Although rarely discussed in academia, if ever, the ‘gay gaze’ as van Buskirk calls it, is the aspect which underpins many of the paintings which feature men in Caillebotte’s work. Paintings which contain elements, sometimes covert in nature, that create an appeal to a homosexual audience but may be missed by the heterosexual viewer.

One of the works mentioned by van Buskirk is the Boating Party of 1877-78 (above), also known as Oarsman in a Top Hat. It is a new acquisition of the Musée d’Orsay in Paris which went on display in January 2023 after being in a private collection. Thus, there’s renewed interest in the painting and a new record of the work which appears on the museum’s website. They describe it as an ‘example of Caillebotte’s desire to produce something truly modern’, and continue with, ‘the painter offers an original ‘immersive’ framing which places the viewer in the boat and seeks to abolish the distance between the space of the painting and that of the viewer’. In this image, we are presented with the scene of a well-dressed male as the rower. The activity here is presumably a leisure one, strenuous enough for the removal of his jacket laid by his side, but not enough for removing the top hat, which in turn acts as a reminder to the class status of the figure. The spectator is permitted to experience a direct and uninterrupted view of the rower’s crotch, which is simply unavoidable. And framed almost centrally. Whilst free to look and enjoy a full view of the rower, the rower’s gaze is averted, therefore avoiding any complication. As pointed out by van Buskirk, the direction of the spectator’s gaze towards the crotch is never highlighted in academic material, or indeed on the museum’s website. 

An example of this can be found in the Paris and Chicago exhibition catalogue from 1995, when Anne Distel confirms how the painting adheres to a Caillebotte compositional trademark of exaggerated foreground and deep perspective, stating it is only the rower’s feet which prevent the artist from getting any closer, and then continues to describe how detailed the strong hands are in the work which provide an indication of the rower’s physical strength. In a very heteronormative reading on physicality and an artist’s eagerness for the viewer to be amidst the action, Distel bypasses the noticeable characteristic of the work. The close proximity of the rower also encourages the viewer to become the companion within the scene, which only heightens the sense of intimacy. The homoeroticism of the painting is therefore subtle, but it is there, and it is indeed surprising that it’s omitted from academic discussion. The rower may not appear heroic or statuesque, and there is no revealing of flesh – Caillebotte frequently created series of paintings and some of his other oarsmen reveal strong arms under short-sleeve shirts – but while the original critique focusses on its modernity in framing and perspective, it does create a desire to ‘look’ for a homosexual audience. Instances such as this are typical of the secondary, homoerotic readings which are apparent to the viewer but omitted from academia in a number of Caillebotte’s works.

It must be stressed that we don’t know if Caillebotte intended for these readings to exist, nor do we know of his sexual preferences, which is likely the main reason scholars have for the most part shied away from speculation. He also created many other works including landscapes and still lifes which obviously just can’t be considered in the same way. This perhaps adds to the ambiguity and covert nature of those images which do appeal to the gay gaze, and ultimately, these readings exist to a modern audience regardless of the original intentions. Even more interesting though is the fact that for most of 2023, Boating Party was hung opposite another of Caillebotte’s major works to feature men, The Floor Scrapers of 1875 (the subject of another blog post to follow soon). I really wonder how many visitors to the Musée d’Orsay noticed the apparent homoeroticism when stood in between these two paintings which were only metres apart? Boating Party is currently touring France, at museums in Lyon, Marseilles and Nantes until August 2024 when it returns to Paris to appear in a new temporary exhibition, one which will explore the masculinity in Caillebotte’s work. We will find out then if academia is ready to accept the homosexual elements within these images…

Sources

Distel, A. (1995). Gustave Caillebotte: Urban Impressionist. Chicago: The Art Institute of Chicago.

Van Buskirk, J. (2023). Straightwashing Gustave Caillebotte. The Gay and Lesbian Review Worldwide.